Lightly and CVAT serve different roles in the vision pipeline: Lightly is an end-to-end platform for data selection, labeling, QA, evaluation, and versioning, while CVAT focuses mainly on image and video annotation.
Lightly vs. CVAT: Comparing All-in-One Vision Platforms for ML Teams
Lightly and CVAT are both tools in the computer vision pipeline, but they serve very different scopes.
Lightly is an all-in-one platform covering everything from dataset curation and smart data selection to labeling, quality assurance (QA), model evaluation, and dataset versioning, effectively replacing the need for multiple point solutions.
In contrast, CVAT is primarily an annotation tool for labeling images and videos.
Machine learning (ML) and computer vision teams face a common bottleneck: preparing, curating, and annotating large datasets for training their models.
The right platform can make or break the efficiency, cost, and quality of your ML data pipeline.
Two leading solutions, Lightly and CVAT (Computer Vision Annotation Tool), offer distinct approaches to vision data curation, annotation, and workflow automation.
In this article, we will provide an in-depth comparison of Lightly vs. CVAT to help you decide which vision platform is the best fit for your team’s needs.

Before we dive into the detailed comparison, let’s briefly overview the profiles of each tool, what they are, and where they fit in a computer vision workflow.
Lightly is a unified computer vision suite that combines curation, labelling, quality assurance (QA), and model training. Its product modules include:
Lightly is scalable for both cloud and on-premises (local) setups and provides a quick start through a simple installation (pip install). Primarily free and open-source, but it also offers paid versions for enterprises.
Here’s a quick overview of its key features:

CVAT is an open-source tool for annotating images and video data. It allows you to create different types of labels precisely, such as boxes, shapes, and points, and with a collaborative interface.
Plus, it has an API that makes it easy to automate tasks and connect with other tools.
Although CVAT is free, it also offers a paid cloud version that comes with extra features, like support for single sign-on (SSO) and the SAM2 model to accelerate video labeling.
Here are the main features of CVAT at a glance:

Now that we have an idea of Lightly and the CVAT platform’s focus, let’s compare them across key features and workflow stages.
We will break their features down into several aspects of a typical computer vision ML pipeline, highlighting how each tool supports them (or not).
Lightly provides extensive support for data exploration and curation before any labeling occurs.
In LightlyStudio, you can visualize the entire dataset through an interactive gallery and embedding plots. This plot allows you to visually see the structure of data, identify distinct clusters (like day vs. night images), and spot outliers. Also, you can easily:

Crucially, Lightly offers smart data selection mechanisms. It helps you to find the most valuable samples to label through its embedding-based analysis.
This includes active learning (selecting samples the model is most uncertain about), diversity selection (to avoid labeling 1,000 near-identical images), and other strategies.

For technical users, LightlyStudio offers a programmatic way to perform automated data selection.

Furthermore, LightlyStudio uses Expressions to combine filtering, sorting, and slicing for dataset queries.

CVAT does not provide built-in data selection or active learning features. Instead, it is designed as a general-purpose annotation engine and supports annotation of large batches.
You must first decide which images need labeling and then upload them as a task in CVAT.

And it will display these images in a list or grid, but without advanced analytics.

Since CVAT lacks the embedding-based analysis that Lightly provides, you can get exploration capabilities by integrating CVAT with external tools such as Lightly or FiftyOne.
Integration lets you perform data selection outside of CVAT and import only the most valuable samples for annotation. But this process requires significant and ongoing engineering effort.
LightlyStudio provides a unified interface to perform annotations for the most common computer vision tasks. It includes classification, object detection (bounding boxes), and segmentation (polygons and masks).
Lightly emphasizes label quality and pipeline efficiency, and provides inline editing of annotations. For example, if you are filtering a dataset and spot a mislabeled class, you can fix it right in the platform without needing to launch a separate job or export the data.

Lightly also allows labeling and QA to blend easily. You can curate a subset and jump directly into labeling those images, then run a QA check, all within the same UI session.

CVAT provides a robust labeling interface and supports a wide array of annotation formats out of the box. Annotation formats include:
For video, CVAT’s UI allows frame-by-frame navigation and can automatically interpolate shapes between keyframes to speed up video annotation.

It also has an Automatic Annotation feature, where you can integrate a pre-trained model from sources like HuggingFace or a self-hosted model to create initial labels.

A key integration is with the Segment Anything Model (SAM), allowing annotators to create precise segmentation masks by simply clicking on an object. Newer versions (SAM 2) even support object tracking in videos.

With its integrated approach, LightlyStudio incorporates Quality Assurance checks as a core part of the data pipeline. There are a few dimensions to QA in Lightly:
Figure 14: Visual QA in LightlyStudio.

CVAT's QA process is human-centered and multi-step, historically manual, but it has introduced automated QA features. These features are primarily focused on measuring annotator quality rather than automatically finding label errors.
To evaluate the quality of annotation, you must create a validation set with golden labels (a Ground Truth job).
CVAT can then auto-calculate quality estimation scores for each annotator’s job by comparing their labels to this ground truth.

The primary QA workflow involves a user with a Reviewer role. This person manually inspects annotations, can accept or reject them, and can log specific issues.

CVAT also has an analytics dashboard that shows annotation progress, speed, and quality stats if a ground truth job is configured.

Lightly closes the loop between data curation, labeling, training, and evaluation through LightlyTrain integration.
Using LightlyTrain, you can train self-supervised models on your unlabeled data. Plus, you can fine-tune them for your task with fewer labels.
Importantly, Lightly provides an active learning loop out of the box. So, you can iterate between selecting data, labeling in LightlyStudio, training with LightlyTrain, and back again.
After training a model, you can import the model’s predictions into LightlyStudio. If the model evaluation shows that certain classes have low precision, you might use Lightly’s search or filtering to find more examples of those classes or edge cases and label them next.
Lightly also offers an API/SDK for LightlyTrain and LightlyStudio to integrate them with external ML pipelines.

CVAT does not include features for model training or evaluation. You cannot train models within CVAT, and it doesn’t come with a model zoo or similar features.
You can use a pre-trained model just to assist labeling, but you cannot evaluate that model’s performance within CVAT. There is no feature to upload predictions to sort the sample that the model is most confused about.
Lightly offer robust features for dataset management and version control. You can easily organize data with tags, metadata, and subsets in LightlyStudio.

On the other hand, CVAT offers basic dataset management within its defined hierarchy.
For a quick overview, here’s a high-level comparison of Lightly vs. CVAT across the features discussed:
Features aside, how do Lightly and CVAT impact real-world projects in terms of performance, efficiency, and outcomes?

Lightly and CVAT serve ML workflows in different ways. Lightly provides a complete, end-to-end solution to projects that need to scale up, while CVAT focuses on quality annotations.
For projects at a production scale, Lightly is the better choice due to its advanced selection features, annotation + quality-checking mechanisms, and model loops that prioritize improvements over tool assembly.
On the other hand, for teams in the early stages that prioritize labeling, CVAT is a good choice because it's open-source and gives you more control.
You can use CVAT for labeling and then combine it with Lightly's tools for curating data, but using LightlyStudio (open-source) can make this process easier (curation + labeling).

Get exclusive insights, tips, and updates from the Lightly.ai team.


See benchmarks comparing real-world pretraining strategies inside. No fluff.